Occupy Wall Street and Marie Antoinette
(Left/Above: Mrs. Baars waving to the peasants)
In an iconic 2011 moment, Occupy protesters met Wall Street bankers enjoying themselves with drinks. A veritable Marie Antoinette greeted them by toasting with her champagne. The divide between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’ could not have been clearer.
By Anthony Migchels for Henry Makow and Real Currencies
Here’s the famous clip.
A source close to the Baars family, E.A., 21 years old, has come forward. Living and very much enjoying ‘the lifestyle’ herself, she is also worried about the blowback against the banker decadence.
Here’s her story.
The Baars Family
It turns out that the lady in pink is Mrs. Baars, wife of Goldman Sachs managing director Willem Baars, who hails from Holland. He has been making a career for himself with the infamous vampire squid that is at the core of Wall Street’s pirate nest. Managing Directors are the second management layer at Goldman Sachs. Only the partners, of whom there are only a few dozen, are higher up the ladder. Partners are allowed to use their own private funds in the Bank’s insider trading rackets, guaranteeing enormous private wealth for the few who make it.
Still, a modest ‘managing director’ can look forward to a $500k base salary. Bonuses for Mr. Baars typically amount to about $8 million per year. Additionally, there is an options package worth about $30 million.
God only knows what Mr. Baars must do for that kind of money. He maintains all his actions are legal. Which is not completely unbelievable, since Goldman Sachs employees in Congress write the laws.
He seems to be involved in mergers and the like. Typically, the insider knowledge that consulting about these matters brings is exploited by the traders of the bank in the markets.
How they see the protests
To Mrs. Baars, the protestors are just ‘peasants’. Losers, jealous of the riches of the bankers. The bankers really feel like ‘Masters of the Universe’. They see themselves as ‘the new Aristocracy’. To them, what they do is all ‘legal’ and thus justified. They deny any wrongdoing, or that their riches come at the expense of others. The protestors are basically just whining scumbags, in their view.
In the aftermath of the meeting in Wall Street on that day in November 2011, hundreds of protestors went to the Baars residence in New York and spent hours at the gates there. One of the Baars cars, a Bentley, was thrashed.
The thrashed Baars Bentley
This was certainly a tense moment, but to the Baars family this just shows what losers the protestors are.
The Lifestyle
It’s all about ‘the Lifestyle’. The Baars family owns 15 luxury cars. Several mansions in America and Europe. A $20 million, 46 meter yacht in St. Tropez.
Says E.A.: “Wall Street and the City are driven by money, status, luxury, trophy wives and more money.” She continues: “just walk into any Mayfair club and you’ll see models and bottles.”
While Mr. Baars makes enormous profits for Goldman, Mrs. Baars’ job, as a banker wife, is to look good and let the money flow. Shopping is the lady’s main pass time. Trips to Milan with her girlfriends to buy shoes a routine matter.
For the kids, there are endless parties. Spraying expensive champagne is a routine device. The fun is in knowing that the peasants would have to work for months for what they blow away in just seconds.
Spraying $1000 dollar per bottle champagne, necessary for any good party.
Luxury, looking good, asset positions, new stuff. Glimmer and glamor make life nice. Are what gives status in the social scene.
Within the Baars family, there is a strong sense that the money must keep coming in to keep up. Addiction to money comes with fear of loss.
Conclusion
They’re children with their hands in the cookie jar. Mrs. Baars is just an uppity blonde who likes to shop for shoes. Avarice and narcissist ambition unchecked.
And it’s end of life. Soon, the American economy will face the crunch of an era. The banking families that employ naive upstarts like the Baars family, are ready to ditch the vehicles, including Goldman Sachs, that have allowed them to usurp all the wealth of the nation and indeed the entire West. Their executives, no longer useful, will be thrown to the wolves. The angry masses will gladly devour them when the time comes.
The ‘solution’ to the problems they have been creating has long been prepared.
And our source? She loves both the people with whom she grew up and ‘the lifestyle’, but she is haunted by the venom of the disenfranchised. She faces a choice.
But: it’s a choice that, in different guises, we all face at some point in life and it’s the same choice that humanity as a whole will finally have to face up to too.
Related:
Ten Atrocities That Would Not Exist Without Usury
‘The New Aristocracy’
The 40 meter, $21 million dollar yacht in St. Tropez.
What is it with girls and shoes?
One of the Baars residences
Banker Babes doing what they do best: shopping
Anthony, please don’t insult Marie Antoinette by likening her to these trash money whores. Marie Antoinette was a heroine and a victim of Freemasonic Jewry as was her husband King Louis XVI.
ha!
Well, I don’t dig Plutocrats and I’m totally uninterested whether they’re Jewish or Gentile. True: the tyranny of the landed gentry was the more bearable.
With respect but until you deal with Jewish European regicide which commenced with the Jew tool Cromwell in 1649 when he took off Charles I head you will flounder in your foundational understanding of the worldwide Canaanite Jew conspiracy.
There is no misunderstanding there, thetruthnotdoctrine.
But bashing the Jews should not distract us from the many problems we have with ‘our own’ ‘elites’.
the simple fact is and remains that should the Jews disappear today, no bank would close and Globalism would continue.
Disagree, if the blood lust Canaanite Jews disappeared peace and prosperity would commence and the present banking system would collapse by default – the Canaanite Jews are the Devil’s Seed – his offspring and they are the driving force behind usury.
Just think of the century of warfare that the bourbon kings brought on France before they were beheaded, thetruthnotdoctrine.
The problem is plutocracy.
Plutocrats war among themselves for power.
The Gentile kings and ‘nobles’ were only marginally better for Europe than the Jews.
Why do you think the Jews could do what they did to Russia?
Because the Czars and the Orthodox Church kept the Russians in bondage and many were initially relieved to get rid of their landed owners.
OK, let me rephrase my earlier comment to include Popery (the Bourbon Wars) with The Canaanite Jews, once rid of both there will be universal peace AND prosperity.
All modern revolutions from The English Revolution in 1642-9 onwards were brought about by The Canaanite Jews.
There was no national debt in England whilst The Stuarts were on the throne until William of Orange.
Your use of the word ‘plutocracy’ is somewhat disengenuous when monarchs were autocrats, not plutocrats and you can have a plutocracy without a monarchy.
E.g. Bolshevik Jew Marxist heirarchies are plutocratic in nature.
All the troubles in Czarist Russia before the revolution were brought about and aggravated by The Canaanite Jews – especially after Russia was defeated by Japan. The Canaanite Jews had it in for The Romanovs after they came to Lincoln’s aid with their navy.
There may not have been national debt, but there was Empire, Plutocracy, War, Feudalism, kabbalah, Babylonian Sun worship.
The ‘private vs. public’ dialectic, or ‘banker vs. state’ dialectic, is pleasant for the bankers.
Those that sat on the throne were ran by the same spiritual master as those that sit on it now.
Victory comes when we reject Usury, State, Empire, even Nation.
Men that submit to Spirit will inherit the world, not ‘kings’.
Nothing wrong with Empire as long as it’s not a Money Empire. Nothing wrong with nationhood. Nationhood is just an extension of family to clan or tribe to nation.
Re ‘kings’ I have covered that in a comment below.
Anthony, out of interest, are you a Gnostic?
I totally disagree, thetruthnotdoctrine.
Everything wrong with Empire. It’s all power centralization at the cost of normal people. Nation and State are two very different entities. One has a future, the other has not.
This is why it’s wrong to over focus on the Jews, instead of methodology. An Empire run by maniacal Gentile powermongers is ‘ok’? I think not.
Christianity and the State are irreconcilable. I like Tolstoi’s take on the issue: he labeled himself a Christian Anarchist and wrote a great pamphlet on the issue.
Do you realize that the Czarist Despotism was actually the key example of the Jews in the 19th century? They hated it, because they didn’t control it. They admired it, because it was so close to their own vision of their Kingdom.
One of Israel’s greatest sins was preferring a King over Godly rule.
The idea that hereditary monarchy is a reasonable way of ruling men is beyond me.
And no, I’m not a ‘gnostic’ as I’m not aligned with any religion. I’m a follower of Christ, but from the clear understanding that the Christ is the Creator that incarnated in Jesus of Nazareth. The Christ is the light of men and it is this light that is also known as the ‘Bhudda Nature’.
Overrating Jesus of Nazareth and calling that man ‘the son of God’ is the quintessential example of humanity’s fall into materialism over the cycle of the last few millennia.
We should worship in Spirit. Worshipping men, be they kings or prophets, is at the heart of the human condition.
I am an adherent of British Israel so your nonsense about gentiles doesn’t wash with me. Are you aware that a gentile is someone who is not a Roman Citizen and nothing to do with being non-Jewish?
I am also not a hu-man, I am a man and you need to learn the difference.
Empire is not about centralisation, it’s about delegation of power to lower ranks and each rank had autonomy (freedom) to rule as he saw fit. E.g. What was good for Canadian people would not have been good for Australian people and vice versa.
Adolf Hitler thought that The British Empire was a good thing and of benefit to the whole world bringing peace and stability and offered naval support to Britain to help maintain it.
In contrast in Jew centralisation there is no delegation of power, nor any autonomy because the individual does not exist, it is all collectivised – only the collective Communist PARTY exists, not the individual within it nor the people that are subjugated and enslaved by it.
Hence you said that there is a difference between nation and state. An empire is a group of nations – a commonwealth, not a group of states. It’s the Jews that have turned nations into politicised states.
How you profess to be a follower of Christ and say blasphemous things like this:
“The Christ is the light of men and it is this light that is also known as the ‘Bhudda Nature’.”
And this:
“Overrating Jesus of Nazareth and calling that man ‘the son of God’ is the quintessential example of humanity’s fall into materialism over the cycle of the last few millennia.”
…beggars belief – how can Yashua Messiah be overated?????? In fact, I have no idea what you are talking about and it’s certainly not Scriptural.
No one has said anything about worshipping kings, but God relented when Israel demanded they be ruled by a king. King Saul failed, but King David who replaced him was a man after God’s heart and He promised him that Israel would never want for a man/woman to sit upon King David’s throne. Yashua Messiah, when He returns to this earth, will take King David’s throne:
Luke 1:32 (KJV) He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and The Lord God shall give unto Him The Throne of His father David:
Kings, Nobility, Royal Priests and Lords are the future, whether you like it or not.
The world would have been a better place if Hitler was permitted to eradicate the Bolsheviks in Russia. But he had the same problem: cosmopolitan blue blooded aristocrats in his high command sabotaging his plans by routinely delaying and disobeying his military orders, attempted assassination, and betrayal of military secrets to the enemy by Admiral Carnaris, chief of Intelligence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWTdZiW_s2I&feature=youtu.be
Do you really think so pm?
I think Hitler’s (and particularly Himmler’s) stance vis a vis the ‘bolsheviks’ (the Jews) in russia, while fully merited in terms of what the Jews had done to Mother Russia, set Germany up for the horrible destruction that was visited upon her.
It’s true that most of the Jews in Russia during the terrible war were killed by Baltics, Ukrainians and other local people, and a case can be made they had every reason for their lust for revenge, but succumbing to the Jewish ‘eye for an eye’ mentality is exactly how they keep us within the matrix. That’s why for me Hitler’s 1942 ‘Auge um Auge’ speech was his final spiritual defeat (I believe he was on Satan’s side from day one).
Cockroaches scurry in face of the light.
Revenge killings, while normal, are not the light.
You only have one problem here Anthony and that is Canaanites, no matter who they are i.e. Jewish or otherwise are only fit for destruction – hence The Canaanite Jews – The Tares – the Devil’s Seed will be bundled up and burnt at the harvest. This will be the finalising of the job the Israelites failed to accomplish over 3,000 years ago.
Occupy is so pathetic. Protests that only involve slogans and banners. They don’t know how banks and wall street operates and have no program on how to fix it. I can see why Mrs. Baars & co just laugh at them. Go ahead insult us, they must laugh, vent and get it out of your system so you can return to your debt slave cages the next day.
‘Occupy’ was always controlled opposition.
THE GOVERNMENT IS SHUTTING DOWN
The government is shutting down
There’s nothing left but death around
I tried to write love songs today
But globalism wouldn’t stay away
There’s too much truth in too few lies
The President wears monkey ties
This total plan still makes no sense
We cannot find law precedents
The people lost their history
To 9/11 and Wiki-P
There used to be a thing we called
Destroying enemies abroad
And one more thing – keep a few guns
For the motherfucking domestic ones
– CHRISTOPHER HAYDEN
Reblogged this on TheFlippinTruth.
Marie Antoinette may be a bad analogy, as the French royals themselves were also victims of the money power (as exhibited by their being the target of the money power-backed Jacobin revolution).
The goal of the money power in all these ‘revolutionary’ scenarios is to set one group of Gentiles against another, over grievances that are actually rightfully blamed on the money power itself (who carefully stays behind the scenes until the time comes to ‘clean up’ the aftermath). Picture a bullfighter who taunts an enraged bull with his cape, stepping aside just at the last second as the bull charges him to allow the bull to clobber some poor innocent schmuck sitting in the audience (so the bullfighter can go home with his woman).
As Henry Ford described perfectly of the Bolshevik Revolution, amidst all of the mayhem of Russian attacking Russian, a phalanx of Chosen rushed through the chaos and promptly proceeded to occupy a large majority of the most important posts in the new Bolshevik government.
As always: “Oh how unfortunate, everything has gone terribly wrong! Now however let us start anew, and of course allow us to handle your finances for you.”
Marie Antoinette a plutocrat? Bourbon France a tiranny?… I’m diappointed.
That is because you are within the box and think in terms of what is known.
Start thinking about a future for humanity without ‘nobles’ and plutocrats.
Start thinking about men untaxed, without land rents, with interest-free credit.
When the Jews murdered the aristocrats it was just a matter of ‘the boss is dead, long live the new boss’.
When the time comes, it’ll be about: ‘the boss is dead. Good riddance’.
Millenarism? No thanks.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0195004566/ref=redir_mdp_mobile/177-9555302-3523451
I agree the Bourbon monarchy in general was not a stellar example of what a Christian kingdom should be. The Habsburgs were much better. But Louis and Antoinette, they were very decent people, much maligned, brutally executed, and their good name slandered ever since. They deserve a little more respect.
@ Anthony
Yashua Messiah will be The King of kings and The Lord of lords in THE KINGDOM, so monarchy and nobility is AND WILL BE very much a part of a Christian’s future including a Royal priesthood.
Even at the time many people were disappointed to hear that Jesus’ Kingdom is not of this world, thetruthnotdoctrine…………
“The World” being a reference to “The System under The Romans and Canaanite Jews” not The Earth.
As of Jan 15, Canadians have usurped their Crown oppressors by establishing a new republic based upon Common Law: The Republic of Kanata. The Crown agencies been served notice that they no longer have any authority over men and women in the Republic of Kanata. Corp Crown Taxes and debts are null and void. http://itccs.org/2015/01/19/local-republic-of-kanata-groups-declare-sovereignty-nullify-crown-authority/ This is how a true revolution is accomplished. This is why occupy and similar protests are a joke.
For more information regarding common law and the Republic of Kanata http://itccs.org/ http://www.republicofkanata.com/
The politically incorrect truth about the French Revolution, from the Mad Monarchist, focusing on the many misconceptions about Queen Marie Antoinette.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZvsjPsyzjA
You cannot coexist with bolshevism or communism. It was created by Talmudic jewish bankers for the purpose enslaving mankind. Hitler protected Christians. The Bolsheviks would murder them all without remorse. Isn’t that what happened later in Russia and China ? The only rational response to Satanic ideology like communism is to fight for its destruction. Hitler was the ONLY nation of merit to oppose Talmudic jewry in all its forms: bolshevism, communism and usury banking. Who has even tried since?
Judaic Communists: The Documentary Record by Michael A. Hoffman II http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html
“The Judaic Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest control. Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant “bourgeoisie” was their prime motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian peasantry of Russia as so many vermin, beginning with Lenin’s attack on them in the summer of 1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been almost completely ignored in Western history.”
But was not Hitler’s response the Jewish response? An eye for an eye? And did he not lose ignominiously to boot? Did not his campaign ultimately give the bankers everything they vied for? Does one defeat an ideology by killing people?
I’m the first to agree that the Jews have nothing to complain about, considering what they did to Russia.
But history has unequivocally shown that Jewry became stronger, more entrenched, more unified, more tribal, more brutal, with every pogrom, every eviction, all ‘anti-semitism’.
The Spirit’s ways are different.
One does not combat evil, but one does good. No need to fight Usury, better to provide interest-free credit. No need for communism when there is broad prosperity and personal freedom. Lies are rebutted by truth, not by the sword. The cockroaches scurry in the face of the light.
The truth is, mankind has been enmeshed in materialism and we have behind us a long cycle of sinking deeper into a materialist, ungodly world view and way of life. The Gentile nations easily buy the Jew’s snake oil, because they seek not within.
They do not come to Him, and thus have no peace.
They prefer the yoke of power over that of the Spirit.
And the Bankers themselves built the Zionist Entity to sacrfice the 6.18 million Jews living there today in a final sacrificial offering.
Hitler was either just plain wrong or entirely a psy-op. And the longer I look at it, the more I tend to think the latter.
Do you really thinks bolshevism could have been contained in Russia with peace and love diplomacy? This attitude is extremely naive and uniformed. Unlike national socialism that aims to uphold sovereignty of an ethnic people, bolshevism has a mandate to conquer, degrade and enslave the world. Stalin planned to attack Germany when they had received enough supplies and technical help from FDR and Churchill. Hitler knew this and launched Barbarossa before this critical mass could be achieved. He would have succeeded had his generals not disobeyed him by marching directly to Moscow, only to be beaten by the winter. That his chief of military intelligence, Admiral Carnaris, was giving secrets to allies didn’t help either.
The Germans didn’t operate death camps. There is no evidence for this. Hitler has no national policy to exterminate the jews. These camps were used for labor and prisoners were treated well. In fact his final solution was give them a homeland in Madagascar:
“”As recently as September 1940 the propaganda ministry had learned that Hitler had given the go-ahead for the Madagascar Plan, under which about three and a half million of the four million Jews currently living within his domain would be shipped to that island in the Indian Ocean a year or two
after the war ended. Since that summer his experts had been studying the possibility of resettling Europe’s ten million Jews on this large island, a French colony. Madagascar was over twice as big as Britain; its pre-war population was four million.”
page 405 “Hitler’s War” by David Irving
As for the debunking of the many holocaust lies see documentaries found here http://holocausthoaxmuseum.com/
The British however invented death camps and used them to murder millions of Boers in South Africa. After the war the Allies, especially General Eisenhower placed 12 million disarmed Germans in camps which were open fields without shelter, where 2 million starved to death. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RzFgopQA6A
The suppressed atrocities committed by Bolsheviks after the war is chronicled in Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 http://www.texemarrs.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=catalog&Product_Code=bboa_hellstorm
I’m very well aware of this pm.
But the revisionists go way overboard in whitewashing Hitler’s long planned, clearly genocidal designs against Russia.
I do not believe that Russia was about to invade Germany. The Kremlin war record shows they were intending to invade after the Western Powers and Germany had destroyed each other. But they didn’t and Germany was at the peak of its powers in 1941. Stalin was not going to attack under these circumstances.
The truth is, Hitler and Stalin both wanted war and the British did everything in their power to facilitate it.
Hitler’s designs against Russia are the prime reason why he was allowed to build up. The Bankers wanted the war most of all.
Hitler’s war against Russia was ideological: he wanted to eradicate Bolshevism only. He had no genocidal plans for Russia or anyone http://holocausthoaxmuseum.com/ Certainly, Bolshevik partisans were targeted for execution during Barbarossa, as they would lead the fanatical rearguard guerilla resistance, but the people in cities and nations unaffiliated with them were treated well. In fact, throughout his assault upon Russia, Hitler’s army were regarded as liberators.
Russia demonstrated their intentions toward Germany clearly by attacking Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romania. FDR was sending supplies to both England (lend lease act) and Russia for the purpose of enabling both to attack Germany. Hitler knew this. Why should he have waited until a numerically superior force in Russia was equipped with the latest in modern weaponry? To defeat the Bolsheviks he would have to attack first. http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/portfolio/part-7-stalin/
The truth is that Hitler’s only ambitions regarding the West were to reverse the injustice imposed upon Germany in the Versailles treaty, which he accomplished. Other than that he wanted peace with Britain. He made over 24 peace offers to Britain that were all flatly rebuffed by Churchill. Britain and the United States started WW2 with air raids of civilians in Berlin and attacks on German merchant ships respectively.
The bankers had conquered Russia in 1917 and installed their Bolshevik tyranny. Why would they allow Hitler to build up the most powerful army in the world only to destroy this? They would never loan him money for this purpose, especially given the fact that his hatred of communism was so well known in advance.
Thus, the only way he could have build up his army was through a nationalized German Bank.
In fact, German national debt stood at 19 billion marks in 1938, lent to them by the German banking system, which was exactly the same as the one that operated under Weimar. A very sizable sum for these days.
Another 12 billion was in effect lent to Hitler by the war profiteers (Krupp, IG Farben et alia), through the MEFO bills.
https://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/hitlers-finances-and-the-myth-of-nazi-anti-usury-activism/
Hitler renounced the debt arising from the Dawes plan. After he conquered France, he stuffed it back up the allies ass in the same trolly car in which the Treaty of Versailles was imposed.
As for German traitors in finance — if in fact your claims about MEFO interest debt is true — and the military high command, all I can say is that it was the only real downfall of Hitler; and perhaps his leniency at Dunkirk, which would have ended Britain and France for good.
Regardless of what he was, as you said, you simply cannot fight material evil (i.e. Satan) on its own level. By choosing violence you are entering the low vibrational state that feeds it. Which is to say, simply by playing its game you lose. Even just hating them provides them with power. Pity them instead–they are going to need it.
I’ve found that the less literate one is of history, the more likely he is to believe that the money power can be beaten on its own terms (i.e. through violence). They fail to understand just how utterly and completely successful the relatively tiny money power has been at defeating such resistance again and again for thousands of years.
On the bright side by resisting them not on a physical but rather spiritual level, you are, as the Gospel said “lumping hot coals on their head.”
A hundred, a thousand, or even a million years of rule over all material creation is worthless when compared with an eternity of spiritual suffering (which make no mistake is the fate that awaits most of them).
Did you know that the new age vibrational nonsense was invented by the British to pacify the people of India through their trained agent Gandhi? http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/mahatma-gandhi-re-writing-indian.html
These new age opiates are still being used to make people surrender to authoritarianism. People are being convinced to surrender their guns and unalienable rights in the belief that its wrong to defend oneself, family, race or national sovereignty. They are being brainwashed with the notion that nothing is worth fighting and risking your life for if it may entail violence. If you know history, you will also know that this attitude has enabled all the tyrannies that now exist around the globe. Communism came to be by brute force and no moral appeal could have stopped it. who tried to stop it? Only one man, one nation had the courage. That communism has murdered and ruined lives of billions cannot be blamed on Adolf Hitler and Germany. That moral responsibility belongs to the cowards that wouldn’t fight when they had the chance.
The entire universe is based on vibration; every atom you are composed of is vibrating as you exist.
Speech (sound), vision (light) and thoughts (electricity) are all vibrations. Or do you disagree?
Of course I like almost anyone else will take up arms to defend my family if and when the time comes. After all I am only human and cannot stand to see harm come to them. However I also understand that it is impossible to stop the materialistic evolution of history through material means. If you can provide an example of where such means have been even moderately successful for more than a blip in time, please share.
What you fail to understand is that the opponent’s ability with words and lies is what enables it to do what it does. It is impossible to beat the world’s best liar with violence when the liar can simply deceive more and stronger people into using violence against you. And that’s exactly what’s happened throughout history.
Another thought: although most people looking at those photos would instinctively envy those girls, spiritually reality being what it is, they should really be pitying them.
Absolutely. These girls are raised to look pretty and spend money. Meaning that their worst impulses are cultivated and that there is no respect for their real nature.
@ thetruthnotdoctrine
That Hitler praised the British Empire just shows he was either a fool or a traitor. Had he really wanted to get rid of ‘the Jews’ he would have obviously invaded London, as that is where the Money Power’s HQ was.
He could also have relentlessly bombarded the square mile known as the City. He didn’t.
The British Empire was a disgusting cancer, that starved millions of Irish and Indians and it was the Brits and their monied handlers that were the main cause of the second world war (together with Hitler and his genocidal plans with Russia and Stalin with his genocidal plans for Europe).
While ‘Britain ruled the waves’, the British common man awaited an abject fate in the Navy or the sweatshops.
The British Empire was built by letting the Amsterdam Jews come to London.
Your are very mistaken that my take on Jesus is ‘not scriptural’.
Here’s John 1:
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Jesus Christ is the name of the Word and Jesus of Nazareth incarnated the Word. It’s the Word that we need to worship, not Jesus of Nazareth, who said of himself: ‘why do you call me good? Only God is good’. And: ‘you will do greater things than I’ (which is impossible, should he have been God).
You, as do all X-tians, worship ‘another Jesus’ (2 Cor 11:4), namely Jesus the Man.
The Word animates all life and lives in all of us. This ‘light’ is indeed what the Buddhist initiate calls the Buddha Nature.
The Word is also known as the Tao, which means ‘the Way’, which is what Jesus Christ called himself (when he spoke through Jesus of Nazareth) also.
I won’t even comment much further, as I’m beginning to think you are a shill as well, I think you are trying to deceive people look the whole passage to prove you wrong.
“Thomas saith to him: Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way? 6Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me.
7If you had known me, you would without doubt have known my Father also: and from henceforth you shall know him, and you have seen him.
8Philip saith to him: Lord, shew us the Father, and it is enough for us. 9Jesus saith to him: Have I been so long a time with you; and have you not known me? Philip, he that seeth me seeth the Father also. How sayest thou, Shew us the Father? 10Do you not believe, that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I speak to you, I speak not of myself. But the Father who abideth in me, he doth the works. 11Believe you not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? 12Otherwise believe for the very works’ sake. Amen, amen I say to you, he that believeth in me, the works that I do, he also shall do; and greater than these shall he do. 13Because I go to the Father: and whatsoever you shall ask the Father in my name, that will I do: that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14If you shall ask me any thing in my name, that I will do.”
Jesus is just saying that other people will have more time to do miracles and teaching, more than He did while here in Earth, always in His name. And the only people that have those are the saints of the ONE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, Outside of which there is no salvation.
These are the works that He is referring to.
That you called little miracles in another post. btw
So no one of the, e.g. Orthodox Christian faith, will be saved?
Depends on which “Orthodox” Church that you are talking about it.
Those who denies the primacy of Rome are damned, because the popes declared as dogma, which was accepted by all the schismatics before they left.
One example to show that was always the creed, way before the Schism.
“The first thing required for salvation is to keep the norm of correct faith and to deviate in no way from what the Fathers have established, because it is not possible to lay aside the words of our Lord Jesus Christ who said, `You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church.’ These words are proved true by their effects because, in the Apostolic See, the Catholic religion has always been preserved immaculate. Desiring in no way to be separated from this hope and faith and following in all things what has been established by the Fathers, we anathematize all heretics.” (Inter ea quae)
Pope Hormisdas, (A. D. 514-523)
But you can see that they allow divorces for example, they are subordinated to the state and things of the kind. Also the fact that are lots of so called Orthodox Church should be a sign that someone is not telling the Truth, as There is just one.
So in the not too distant future when the Catholic Church (or the entity that claims to be such) openly approves homosexuality and gay marriage, those who refuse to go along with it and break with the Church–they’re not saved either?
And before you try to argue that that day will never come, I can assure you it is coming.
That day has indeed arrived: http://www.novusordowatch.org/pope-francis.htm
Sedevacantism describes a movement of Catholics that reject the current Pope as an imposter: that “Bergoglio is not a real pope, and the papal office is therefore objectively vacant (sede vacante = the Holy See is vacant). ” http://www.fathercekada.com/2013/11/19/sedevacantism-a-quick-primer/ http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/why-sedevacantism-cekada.htm
“Those who denies the primacy of Rome is damned.”
Ridiculous. The Gospels say that anyone who believes on Jesus’ name is saved.
Christians aren’t expected to worship Rome. They’re expected to worship God as he came in the form of the Son sanctified by the Spirit.
If the Catholic Church be the means through which a person does that, then great, but one needn’t be a professing Roman Catholic to be a Christian.
If you honestly believe that all otherwise sincere and loyal followers of Jesus Christ and the Gospel are going to hell because they’re not express members of the Roman Catholic Church then you’re living in a fantasy.
“Pope” Francis is not even a priest.
Some of the orthodox are Catholics (they recognize the primacy of Rome), you are making confusion I guess.
I’m sedevacantist, I don’t listen to the Counterfeit Church, but I recognize the Primacy of Peter (and Rome).
Everything said and done after 1958 is absolutely invalid. Because “the popes”, all them, were Public Heretics, so we don’t need to wait a declaration to denounce them, and see that they are Outside the Church.
“If you honestly believe that all otherwise sincere and loyal followers of Jesus Christ and the Gospel are going to hell because they’re not express members of the Roman Catholic Church then you’re living in a fantasy.”
They are not following Jesus, as Christ built a Church not a book club or schismatic churches, to follow Him include be Catholic, obviously.
Only one problem, Nahh, your ‘church’ is a counterfeit founded by Simon Magus (Simony – selling of salvation) not Simon Peter. Peter as pope is the only claim (a false claim) you people have and he was never a bishop of anywhere, let alone Rome. The first pope was not until Pope Heraclas of Alexandria 232-248 AD.
Peter was a messenger (apostle) to The Ten Tribes of Israel scattered abroad from Parthia in the east to the British Isles in the west. The first church planted outside of Jerusalem was in Britain in 37 AD predating Antioch.
Furthermore the title Pontiff Maximus is an ancient title of heathen Rome dating from 700 BC. This alone tells us who unholy Rome really is – the ‘church’ of the Whore of Revelation.
Who told you that ? The protestants, the atheist, the masons or the gnostic ?
And if that is true why is Rome standing still and them failing ?
We can are sedevacantist and defy the so-called authority of the heretics pretending to be “the Church” because that is the teaching of the Church. We are obliged to resist heretics be him laity or even the pope.
As the pope is the Vicar of Christ, he is there while we wait for the second coming, his role is to “feed the lambs”, that means keep them in the right path, until the Lord come to reign the rightful and damn the wicked to the pit of hell they belong to.
You say that you don’t need the Church, okay lets assume that for the sake of argument.
So,
How do you go to confession ? (and clean your sins so you might enter the kingdom)
Do you receive baptism ? (Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.)
Do you accept Jesus teaching on marriage and things of the kind ?
Do you accept the Holy trinity ? (Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.)
How do you receive the Holy communion ? (God requires a sacrifice, before was an animal, now it’s Himself in the Eucharist, the perfect sacrifice)
“Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. ”
This is non-sense. We pray for all heretics and non-believers to convert so they might be saved and we offer the teachings, if they refuse the good-news that is their own fault, they can’t claim that God didn’t warn them about it.
You said: “Who told you that ? The protestants, the atheist, the masons or the gnostic?”
Yashua Messiah told me in His Word – The Holy Scriptures.
The Protestants????? Ha Ha Ha The Protestants are one of your trinity worshipping anti-Christ slapper daughters. You illegitimates are all the same and all bound together by the same satanic trinity lies.
The Godhead is a Duality of Father and Son with The Holy Spirit as Their Power – an ‘it’ not a ‘he’.
You said: “And if that is true why is Rome standing still and them failing?”
Failing???? I am not failing – Many are called FEW are chosen. Wide is the path to destruction (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be that find it i.e. 1 billion Roman Catholics and 70 million AngliCains – you tell me how many Orthodox!!
Rome is only just standing and will fall very soon – I have that on The HIGHEST AUTHORITY!!!
You said: “We can are sedevacantist and defy the so-called authority of the heretics pretending to be “the Church” because that is the teaching of the Church. We are obliged to resist heretics be him laity or even the pope.”
Well as Rome is not the church then all your Sedevacantism is academic BS – YES?
You said: “As the pope is the Vicar of Christ, he is there while we wait for the second coming, his role is to “feed the lambs”, that means keep them in the right path, until the Lord come to reign the rightful and damn the wicked to the pit of hell they belong to.”
There is no such Holy Scriptural title or position as ‘Vicar of Christ’. ‘Vicar of Christ’ is just one of your millions of syllogisms – fake, artificial constructs to fool the plebs and proles of your satanic religion. One of your major slogans should be “If we can’t blind ’em with science we’ll baffle ’em with b**l s**t.” LOL
You said: “You say that you don’t need the Church, okay lets assume that for the sake of argument.”
I don’t argue, I tell people The Truth, and I am The Church – period – called and chosen by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah.
You said: “So, How do you go to confession ? (and clean your sins so you might enter the kingdom)”
1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
You said: “Do you receive baptism ? (Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.)”
Yes, I am Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s name alone not into the heathen Egyptian trinity.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/
You said: “Do you accept Jesus teaching on marriage and things of the kind?”
Oh yes.
You said: “Do you accept the Holy trinity ? (Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.)”
No way, I am a Christian, not a heathen Babylonian/Egyptian blasphemer.
You said: “How do you receive the Holy communion ? (God requires a sacrifice, before was an animal, now it’s Himself in the Eucharist, the perfect sacrifice)”
Whenever my wife and I feel like it. With the indwelling of the Holy Spirit 24/7 we tend not to worry about the outward physical things, as we need no reminders of Yashua Messiah, we think of Him numerous times every day of our lives.
You said: “Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.”
Yes, Yashua Messiah fulfilled The Law and The Prophets with His death and RESURRECTION.
You said: “This is non-sense. We pray for all heretics and non-believers to convert so they might be saved and we offer the teachings, if they refuse the good-news that is their own fault, they can’t claim that God didn’t warn them about it.”
You have no good news only bad news. Only the Roman Cult has heretics and as the Roman Cult is a fraud and a money making scam organisation, and always has been, then there are no such people as heretics.
I trust this answers all your meaningless religious points.
You even changed my comment, you are a shill probably or a really confused person:
“Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”
Jesus said that was a trinity.
The duality doesn’t exit in/is God, God is perfect. He is everything that is good in a perfect way. 100%
Also you are anti-science completely, real science confirms Church teachings, obviously.
“1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.”
That is what you don’t understand that if you ever committed a sin by your logic you are not of Christ so you are damned already by your own logic.
“Yes, I am Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s name alone not into the heathen Egyptian trinity.”
You are going against Jesus own words as shown above.
As you probably just accept the Bible of the lustful heretics from hell here you go, KJV:
“A 18And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. 19Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”
I don’t argue with protestants, it’s a waste of time. I’ve warned if you don’t want to listen that is not my problem.
“Even if Catholics faithful to tradition are reduced to a handful they’re the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ.”
St.Athanasius
The Church cannot fail, obviously.
That is why we are the target everywhere and why the counterfeit church changed the rite of ordination. But we are going to revive soon or later otherwise it’s indeed the end of the world.
Catholics are Catholics and Catholics are not mentioned in The Holy Scriptures and that’s because Catholicism is hu-man made. The Church of God is the only church mentioned in The Holy Scriptures otherwise know as The Assembly of God or the Congregation of God – those called and CHOSEN by The Father – no one else.
You said: “You even changed my comment, you are a shill probably or a really confused person:”
The Truth can NEVER be confusion only religions cause and create confusion.
You said:
“Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”
Jesus said that was a trinity.
That verse only mentions water and The Holy Spirit not the trinity and it is a reference to Baptism where a man dies with Yashua Messiah in the watery grave and comes up out of the water to have hands laid upon him to receive The Holy Spirit.
If you think the trinity is mentioned there then you must be reading that into it. A favourite trick of Rome.
You said: “The duality doesn’t exit in/is God, God is perfect. He is everything that is good in a perfect way. 100%”
Well John says otherwise:
1 John 2:22 (KJV) Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is anti-Christ, that denieth The Father and The Son.
The Father and The Son – the only True Godhead.
1 John 2:24 (KJV) Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in The Son, and in The Father.
Continue in The Son and in The Father NOT continue in a heathen trinity.
You said: “Also you are anti-science completely, real science confirms Church teachings, obviously.”
I have no use for science, when it comes to things Spiritual, science is mostly the foolishness of men with their five senses.
Rom 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
“1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.”
You said: That is what you don’t understand that if you ever committed a sin by your logic you are not of Christ so you are damned already by your own logic.
Logic be damned, I quoted a Holy Scripture that’s quite easy to understand if you’re Born of God. If you’re not born of God i.e. born of religion, then you will never understand it, nor comprehend it. This means that you are worse than dead in your sins.
“Yes, I am Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s name alone not into the heathen Egyptian trinity.”
You said: You are going against Jesus own words as shown above.
Nonsense I am endorsing and confirming what Yashua Messiah said.
You said: As you probably just accept the Bible of the lustful heretics from hell here you go, KJV:
“A 18And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. 19Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”
Matthew 28:19 and 1 John 5:7-8 are both spurious verses added to The Holy Scriptures by the mongrel dog Jerome circa 390 AD
I gave you this link so I will give you it again where I explain how Matthew 28:19 is a spurious verse:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/
You said: I don’t argue with protestants, it’s a waste of time. I’ve warned if you don’t want to listen that is not my problem.
I am NOT a Protestant, Protestants are as deceived as you blasphemers – you all worship the heathen trinity so you’re all the same – deluded and deceived.
See no reason to argue.
“Logic be damned.”
Enough said.
Of course, you’re devoid of the Spiritual dimension which renders logic irrelevant unless enjoined with The Spiritual.
All you have is religion which can never save you.
You’re right on the money here thetruthnotdoctrine, but you have not yet rid yourself from religion entirely yet either.
I have no religion, following Yashua Messiah is not religion – you’re the one with religion – demonic Buddhism!! Have you got a stone Buddha or a wooden one? LOL
Religion is the name given to people who follows something it means literally what binds people. If you are from a Latin language speaking you can see there.
So the religion of people today being Mammon’s one it’s accurate description for example.
Indeed Jesus didn’t leave a doctrine the way you understand the word.
Like you can be a Catholic in different ways, but the Catholic doctrine is one.
You can be more Augustinian (kind of Platonic), Thomistic (kind of Aristotelian, and others) etc.
These are systems of though let’s put this way, they are created to help to organize your ideas and help you to follow Jesus’ teaching more accurately.
They are commentaries on the Bible teachings using those glasses.
For instance, St Thomas Summa was questions asked by people and answered by him explaining the reason. That was real debate. The real universities of that time.
The “doctrine”, becomes extensice because we have to address the heresies and non-sense, of people like you, that are always coming up, as was the circumcision of the gentiles before ( below).
St. Thomas committed some errors, pretty much all saints made some mistakes, that is why the pope it’s important to decide in a particular matter decisively. To help people to avoid mistakes and perfect our ways.
Like St. Peter did.
You have dogmas that need to be followed and accepted it, based on Sacred Scripture.
Like the trinity is a dogma, it’s implicit in the Bible.
To say a trinity is just a doctrine to explain how God it’s 1 in 3 persons.
That is the dogma.
Also it’s a mystery as it’s impossible to understand exactly how does it works.
But we have indications on the bible.
I like particularly Genesis on this regard. It’s always there like a living being in the Holy Bible the way the 3 interact.
Also in the conception it’s pretty clear the 3 acting together. And Jesus saying to baptize in the name of the 3. Anyways.
Acts of the apostles teaches that look below.
“6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, PETER got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”
12 The whole assembly became SILENT as they listened to Barnabas and Paul telling about the signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them. 13 When they finished, James spoke up. “Brothers,” he said, “listen to me. 14 Simon[a] has described to us how God first intervened to choose a people for his name from the Gentiles. 15 The words of the prophets are in agreement with this, as it is written:
16 “‘After this I will return
and rebuild David’s fallen tent.
Its ruins I will rebuild,
and I will restore it,
17 that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord,
even all the Gentiles who bear my name,
says the Lord, who does these things’[b]—
18 things known from long ago.[c]
You said: “Religion is the name given to people who follows something it means literally what binds people. If you are from a Latin language speaking you can see there.”
Religion gets its name from the multifaceted demon Legion that Yashua Messiah cast into the Gadarene swine. The swine died but Legion did not as demons (spirits) cannot be killed. This means that Legion re-invented himself as Re-Legion = religion. That’s why there are so many religions and ALL are demonic including the Roman Catholic RELIGION = RE-LEGION.
You said: “So the religion of people today being Mammon’s one it’s accurate description for example.”
Satan or Mammon is the god of all religions including yours and materialism. In fact your money making cult is more materialistic than that of Mammon led secularism or atheism.
You said: “Indeed Jesus didn’t leave a doctrine the way you understand the word.”
Yashua Messiah had no doctrine only The Good News, the Good News of the coming Kingdom of God with Him ruling as King of kings and Lord of lords, NOT Pope of popes or Cardinal of cardinals. LOL
You said: “Like you can be a Catholic in different ways, but the Catholic doctrine is one. You can be more Augustinian (kind of Platonic), Thomistic (kind of Aristotelian, and others) etc.”
It doesn’t matter how many ways you can be a Catholic. A Catholic is a Catholic and is NOT a Christian. As in the story of the man who was once asked if he was a Christian and he replied NO, I am a Roman Catholic. So you see he knew there was a difference but, of course, in his ignorance, had not realised what he had admitted i.e. that he was not a Christian.
You said: “These are systems of though let’s put this way, they are created to help to organize your ideas and help you to follow Jesus’ teaching more accurately.”
Yes this is the problem i.e. Rome and its creations – premises and syllogisms – artificial top down constructs or pyramids that help only the hierarchical system of The Nicolaitanes which Yashua Messiah HATES.
To follow Yashua Messiah one only needs to be Spirit led – no need for any religion.
Romans 8:14 (KJV) For as many as are led by The Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
You said “They are commentaries on the Bible teachings using those glasses. For instance, St Thomas Summa was questions asked by people and answered by him explaining the reason. That was real debate. The real universities of that time.
I have no need of glasses and I only use one commentary occasionally for historical research and that’s Adam Clarke’s Commentary.
You said: “The “doctrine”, becomes extensice because we have to address the heresies and non-sense, of people like you, that are always coming up, as was the circumcision of the gentiles before ( below).”
Doctrine is for know-nothing Bible intellectuals, theologians and philosophers who like their the Pharisaical and Hellenising forebears made the Word of God to none effect.
Col 2:8 (KJV) Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
You said: “St. Thomas committed some errors, pretty much all saints made some mistakes, that is why the pope it’s important to decide in a particular matter decisively. To help people to avoid mistakes and perfect our ways. ”
I have no knowledge of Thomas as his written work is not recorded in the Holy Scriptures, and being Spirit led I have no need of any Popes and what they may or may not decide. Let Popes decide for you deceived dupes who cannot think for yourselves as sons of God.
Re the trinity lie, go here and learn something for the first time in your wretched life:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/
Baptism is into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name ALONE.
I have not bothered with the rest of your nonsensical miss-use of the Scriptures.
You really are a confused individual Anthony and to call Hitler a fool is foolishness in itself. Hitler wanted peace with Britain and France from day one. If anything he misjudged the control the Jews had over Churchill, having only dealt with Chamberlain prior to that who wanted peace. Hindsight historians tend to be very selective when they have a ‘Christian’ Zionist agenda.
He did bomb the Square Mile but had no axe to grind with the British people. Had Churchill not bombed Berlin on the day he became PM Hitler would not have bombed Britain at all.
What gets me with you Jew lovers is that you cannot get it through your heads that Hitler’s principal enemy was Bolshevik Jew Marxism in the east and rightly so.
To call The British Empire a disgusting cancer is pure liberal Bolshevik Marxist Jew propaganda.
The British common man suffered at the hands of the Jew via usury.
If you’re invoking Buddha then you’re not a true follower of Yashua Messiah – period.
Yashua Messiah IS The Word, The Truth, The Light, The I Am and The Way and He was The Son of man, the second Adam – a quickening Spirit.
The title ‘Jesus of Nazareth’ is purely of this world, Nazareth being a mere geographical place name.
We all have to answer that question that Jesus posed to his disciples Nahh.
The key in understanding this passage (and indeed the entire NT) is that the Word is speaking here, not a man.
The British Empire was BUILT by the Jews thetruthnotdoctrine!! It only became a force after Henry VIII enacted ‘an act against Usurie’, allowing Usury. It only became in any way relevant after Cromwell and his predecessors let the Jews in, with the very express goal of overtaking the Amsterdam Empire.
So I’m not at all confused when I call Hitler a fool (at best). You too badly underrate the total Money Power control over the British Empire.
Why did Hitler attack a proxy like Marxism, while ignoring the main thing? Capitalism, aka Usury and Banking?
Why did Hitler sideline Feder? Why did he go after the little Jew while letting the banks continue unscathed in Germany? With the same owners?
Can’t you see that ‘marxism’ was a total distraction? That Hitler was not going after the Marxists, but after Russia? That if he really was after the Money Power, that he would have invaded London?
No, you have not solved the riddles of WW2 yet my friend, if you have only such superficial answers to these pressing questions.
Jesus Christ is the Way and the I AM.
Lao Tse and Buddha were two of his most esteemed prophets.
The British Empire was built by who??????? ROTFL
Since when did uncivilised scavengers and a racial interbred scum sit down to afternoon tea with cucumber sandwiches and play cricket. Silk purses and sow’s ears come immediately to mind.
What stinking Jew would know how to lay railway tracks across continents?
All the Jew is good for is lying, stealing and killing and it’s time you got that through your head, Anthony. Your mind is poisoned by Jew lies and propaganda. You also spend too much time in the Jesuit Makow’s company.
You then say The Money Power’s control over the British Empire, so which is it? Only you see-saw from one to the other to build your strawman arguments. The British Empire would have come into being with or without The Jew. In fact without The Jew it would still be in existence today.
Hitler sidelined Feder in favour of Funck who was a disciple of Feder’s once he had sussed out the treacherous Rothschild pawn Schact. Hitler was well read but not a financial wizz kid.
Hitler hated Jew Marxism and Russia was the stronghold of Marxism and Russia also had all the mineral resources Germany needed. London with its funny money did not. Plus Germans always look east, militarily, never west – the Germans being descendants of the The Assyrians.
Invading London was an irrelevance, as financial centres are easily moved and Canada would have been the location used if necessary. Plus Hitler never wanted war with Britain a point you keep avoiding.
Yashua Messiah NEVER had Buddhist prophets – period.
Yashua Messiah is The Word, The Truth, The Way, The I AM, The Light, The King of Righteousness, The King of Salem (Peace) Emmanuel (God with us) and Melchesidec.
No thetruthnotdoctrine, if you don’t know about the Puritan’s drive to get the Jews back into Britain so they could take over the Capitalist hegemony of Amsterdam, if you don’t know about the total Judaization of the British ‘artistocracy’ since the late 1600’s, then you are not quite as well versed in Judaic control as you imagine.
And your spiritual insight is severely lacking too.
You are way too obsessed by perceived ‘dogma’ and your personal (mainly catholic) explanation of the Bible (the NT anyway).
You don’t understand what the Christ is, therefore you do not notice that the words that the Taoists and Buddhists use point at the same thing.
You’re too materialist and think you can catch the Christ in words, but the first line of the Tao states: ‘that which can be named is not the Tao’.
We can only know the Christ beyond thinking (let alone writing: scripture).
Once you know the Spirit, you recognize those who spoke of Him.
Usury is the ultimate Empire builder.
Control of the monetary system the ultimate centralizer of power in society.
‘he who controls the British money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the British money supply’.
By usurping the wealth and power of the realm, it can be projected outward and this is the secret of the great Capitalist Empires: Amsterdam, London and America.
At times, you do talk a lot of nonsense Anthony. Without usury The British Empire would have been bigger and even more powerful than it was and, as I said, still in existence today.
The Bolshevik Marxist Jews made sure the Empire fell through two contrived world wars and made sure Britain was turned into a multicultural cesspit since WW2. It’s not rocket science and yet you seem to make it so.
I don’t talk nonsense thetruthnotdoctrine. You just need to take a few more steps, that’s all.
First, Usury forces economic growth. Then it concentrates this growth in ever fewer hands.
Do you understand the implications of this for Empire building?
Are you now ready to face the historical fact that the British Empire wannabees brought in the Jews in the 17th century?
Can you now understand why the big Capitalist empires that conquered the world for the Jews had the biggest economies? As the basis of their Empires?
The idea that Empire is good when it is ran by non Jews and bad while it is ran by Jews is one of the diseases that ravages truthseeking in many circles.
I’m not interested in Empire. I promote freedom and justice for common people
The first thing you conveniently leave out in your arguments, Anthony, is the fact that Orange the Dutchman was the driving force of the Jew take over. He wanted money to finance HIS wars and in order to obtain that money he fixed the setting up of the B of E in 1694 and the borrowing LONG TERM of £1.2m. The Stuart monarchs, prior to that, had only ever borrowed SHORT TERM and then PAID IT BACK.
The other point you ALWAYS forget is the fact that Monarchs could always have printed (raised) their own money and secured it with their nation’s assets and/or their people’s labour (taxes). Whether they were too dim to understand this I don’t know, but it was always an option open to them which they never took due the snake Jew’s usury deceptions.
Empire wannabees as you disparagingly call them were not responsible for the rise of Napoleon and William Pitt the younger borrowed £500m at interest in 1799 to finance those wars. Now you obviously know who stirs up ALL WARS and REVOLUTIONS unless you’re living in denial.
Empire building is primarily about trade, not usury. The Jews hijacked The Empire and fleeced it through usury like the leacherous parasites that they are. Had The Empire been built through trade and trade alone with interest free money it would have been 1000 times wealthier and even bigger and the people at home would have prospered beyond measure.
You know as well as I that the poverty of British working people during the 18th 19th and early 20th centuries was as a direct result of Jew usury and nothing else.
If there had been no Usury, wealth would have been decentralized thetruthnotdoctrine. Decentralized wealth is anathema to Empire. That’s the whole crux. Decentralized power cannot be projected outwardly. People would have used their affluence to live a good life, instead of going over to someone else’s land and go conquer that.
Furthermore, I can’t believe your childish love of ‘monarchs’ and ‘nobles’. These people were just crooks who lived off the life blood of the people. They were, in their time, the biggest scumbags and thus came up on top. That’s how power works.
You’re really very naive about these things…..the reason the Jews have won the struggle for power is simply because they were the most ruthless of them all, but they had good competition, no doubt.
For instance: the Jews admired the Czar’s unassailable despotism and saw him as a big example of how they would rule themselves. And you think he was of God, hahahaha 😀
Rest assured you’re in good company….everybody loves princes and princesses, no?
Bling rules!
Here you go again confusing the principles of Bolshevik Jew Marxism (centralisation) with Empire. Empire DOES NOT MEAN CENTRALISATION – PERIOD. Empire is NOT Bolshevik Jew Marxism. The Empire was well established before Marx even came on the scene and would have come into being whether with money at interest or with interest free money.
The Englishman was born to build Empire as were the French and the Dutch (I wonder what your brave poineering countrymen would say to you) but by contrast the Americans were not, being protectionist, insular and inward looking. The money source, and on what terrms, is by the by.
It is not childishness nor is it love – it is respect for Royalty. Royalty comes from God via The Patriarch Judah and Judahite Israelite Kings rule by divine right, just as David and Solomon and all their descendants ever since down to QE II have done. You cannot dispose of what God has allowed to be put in place or has directed to be put in place, whether they be good or bad. Monarchy is only answerable to God.
Judaised satanic mainstream Christianity, especially in the USA, has no respect for Monarchy even though, all bar one, US Presidents has been of the Judahite Royal blood line.
Anti-monarchism is Bolshevik Marxist and Freemasonic in nature, hence the regicide of European Monarchies. If you’re anti-monarchy then you are an ally of the Bolshevik Marxist Jews by default.
The Czar Nicholas was a descendant of Queen Victoria so therefore a Royal Judahite Israelite King and that is one of the reasons the Canaanite Bolshevik Jews murdered him and his dear family.
I believe the current British Royal family will end with Charles who will be Charles III. William it is alleged is the son of King Juan Carlos of Spain (an Egyptian) and Diana Spencer was alleged to be a Goldsmith (a Canaanite Jewess) so will never come to the throne. Kate Middleton is also a Goldsmith (a Canaanite Jewess).
The Puritans were Judaisers or 17th century Pharisees so of course they were Jew friendly. They were the Christian Zionists of their day. The Stuart kings were not Judaisers. If anything they were Papists more than anything else with the exception of James I. Charles I had a Papist wife and James II was an outright Papist, hence they turned to the Dutchman who was also a Judaiser.
My Spiritual condition is fine being Indwelt by The Holy Spirit and I have no need of insight whatever that means. It is your spiritual condition that is dodgy with your invoking of satanic Buddhism. I suggest you do a word search for Buddha in the Holy Scriptures and see if you can find it. LOL
You say I don’t understand what “The Christ” is, as if it’s an abstract. That tells me you have no idea of WHO Yashua Messiah is – God come in the flesh, crucified, resurrected a quickening Spirit after three days and three nights in the tomb and now sits at The Father’s right hand in the third heaven. I suggest you meditate long and hard on my words and repent of your Buddha silliness.
One final point, the only people who spoke of Him were His Messengers (Apostles).
Here are a few songs that fit the bankster theme… enjoy. 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wvne67SVVw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAXTkQZpJ9M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SLE0A4yi3E
Tragedy and Hope and Economics
http://jaysanalysis.com/2012/01/25/tragedy-and-hope-and-economics/
Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism
http://jaysanalysis.com/2015/02/21/why-billionaire-oligarchs-bankroll-feminism/